0
/ 100
Real traction, but rough engineering makes it hard for contributors to trust.
Run Claude Code on OpenAI models
A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code
Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to C (77).
See your top fixesTop fixes
Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight
- 1Tests18pt
Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
- 2CI/CD14pt
Add a step like `run: npm test`, `run: pytest`, or `run: tox` to your workflow file.
- 3CI/CD14pt
Add `pull_request:` to the workflow `on:` triggers.
- 4CI/CD14pt
Add a lint step to catch style issues automatically.
Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.
The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.
Scorecard
Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first
Documentation
66
No license detected.
→ Add a LICENSE file. Without one, nobody can legally use, copy, or contribute to your code.
Contributing guidance is in the README, not a dedicated CONTRIBUTING.md (−20 pts).
→ Moving it to a CONTRIBUTING.md makes it easier to find and keeps the README focused. A dedicated file earns +47 pts base.
README is present.
README documents how to install the project.
Engineering
21
No tests detected anywhere in the repository.
→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
No linter or formatter configured.
→ Add [tool.ruff] to pyproject.toml. Ruff handles linting and formatting in one tool and replaces flake8, isort, and black.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/publish.yml).
Lockfile present (uv.lock). Installs are reproducible.
Project health
93
Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- -Commits (30d / 90d)
- 473Forks
- 0Releases
Community
- -Community health
- -authors own >50% of commits
- 3,649Watchers
Responsiveness
- 4d 6hMedian issue response
- 47d 10hMedian PR merge time
- 64Open issues
Repository files12 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/publish.yml).
- .dockerignore
- .env.example
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- .python-version
- DockerfileGood: Environment pinned via Dockerfile.
- pic.png
- pyproject.tomlGood: Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- server.py
- tests.py
- uv.lockGood: Lockfile present (uv.lock). Installs are reproducible.
Add this badge to your README
It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.
[](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/1rgs/claude-code-proxy)