What 51 graded repositories reveal

Every repo RepoGrade scores feeds these aggregates: how quality tracks reach, age, and maintenance, and what separates the best repos from the rest.

Repositories
51
Kotlin
Median score
68
out of 100
Median stars
262
GitHub stars
Median age
2.2 yr
50 measured
Ship releases
76%
50 measured
Are forks
4%
50 measured

How the corpus scores

Each dot is a repo, colored by grade. Corpus medians divide the four quadrants. Distributions below show the same data sliced by band and popularity tier.

Quality vs popularity

Hover a region to highlight it and see counts. Toggle the X axis between stars and contributors.

X axis
median 262med. 68HIDDEN GEMS11 · 23%EXEMPLARY15 · 32%NEEDS WORK10 · 21%VIRAL, MESSY11 · 23%02550751001101001k10kStars (log scale)Score

Score distribution

Repos per 10-point band, colored by grade

Score by popularity tier

Box = P25-P75, line = median, whisker = P10-P90. Colored by grade.

Group by
0204060708090100ABCDF10-100n=5100-1kn=361k-10kn=5

GitHub stars · box = P25-P75, line = median, whisker = P10-P90

Scores climb steadily with popularity

Median score within each star tier. The grade mix hides this because most repos have few stars - but quality and reach rise together.

What top repos do that the rest don't

Average pass rate for A/B vs D/F repos, by dimension and by check. Filtered to Kotlin. Based on 35 repos.

Quality gap, by dimension

Average check pass rate across all checks in each category, for top-graded vs. bottom-graded repos.

Documentation+39pp
A/B
93%
D/F
54%

4 checks averaged

Engineering+37pp
A/B
83%
D/F
46%

6 checks averaged

Project health+9pp
A/B
100%
D/F
91%

2 checks averaged

Pass rates side by side

Each row is one check. Filled = A/B pass rate, hollow = D/F. +Npp = percentage-point gap.

D/F passA/B pass0%25%50%75%100%Linting and formatting+89ppInstall and run instructions+64ppContributing guide+50ppIssue and PR templates+43ppCI/CD+42ppTests+39ppREADME+29ppActivity+14ppLicense+11ppReproducibility+7ppRepository metadata+4ppDependency manifest+4pp

All checks

CheckA / B pass rateD / F pass rateGap
Linting and formatting
100%
11%
+89
Install and run instructions
100%
36%
+64
Contributing guide
71%
21%
+50
Issue and PR templates
86%
43%
+43
CI/CD
71%
29%
+42
Tests
100%
61%
+39
README
100%
71%
+29
Activity
100%
86%
+14
License
100%
89%
+11
Reproducibility
43%
36%
+7
Repository metadata
100%
96%
+4
Dependency manifest
100%
96%
+4

Does a better grade attract more attention?

Median traction signals per grade band. Toggle across stars, forks, watchers, open issues, and contributors.

Median traction by grade

Toggle across stars, forks, watchers, issues, contributors

Metric

How actively are repos maintained?

Release discipline and project posture signals - the upkeep story behind a grade.

Release discipline by grade

Share of repos shipping at least one tagged release, per grade band

Project posture

Fork quality penalty, archived repos, and release cadence

Quality: forks vs. original repos

Originals
68
Forks
42

Forks score 26 points lower on average (2 forks of 50 measured)

Archived (read-only)0%

0 of 50 measured

Ship releases76%

38 of 50 measured

Does age or size move the score?

Median score across how long a repo has existed and how large it is on disk.

Score by repo age

Median score across age cohorts

Score by repo size

Median score across size on disk

Most common topics, by quality

Topics repos tag themselves with - ranked by frequency, with the median score of all repos carrying each tag.

Top 3 topics
1android
15
73
2kotlin
14
75
3jetpack-compose
5
73