Strong community interest, but tests, CI, or docs need work.

Bayesian inference with probabilistic programming.

Documentation

73

Contributing guide5pt25

Contributing guidance is in the README, not a dedicated CONTRIBUTING.md (−20 pts).

Moving it to a CONTRIBUTING.md makes it easier to find and keeps the README focused. A dedicated file earns +47 pts base.

Install and run instructions9pt45

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt100

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

60

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Reproducibility6pt20

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

Commit the lockfile for this project's package manager so installs produce the same dependency versions everywhere.

CI/CD14pt57

CI is configured (.github/workflows/Tests.yml).

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (test).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

68

Dependency manifest6pt0

No dependency manifest detected at root.

Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • 13 / 31
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 239
    Forks
  • 247
    Releaseslatest 7y ago

Community

  • 75% - Good
    Community health
  • 2 bus factor
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 2,239
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 2d 23h
    Median issue response
  • 1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 24
    Open issues
Repository files13 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/Tests.yml).
    Good: Dependabot covers 2 ecosystems (github-actions, julia). Dependencies stay current.
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • docs
  • ext
  • src
  • test
    Good: Test files detected (test).
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .JuliaFormatter.toml
  • CITATION.bib
  • CLAUDE.md
  • HISTORY.md
  • LICENCE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • Project.toml
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.