jupyter/notebookNew scan
96/ 100 · A

A top-tier open source project. Docs, tests, and CI are all in excellent shape.

Jupyter Interactive Notebook

Jupyter Notebook13,204 starsBSD-3-Clauseupdated today

Outstanding work. A score of 96/100 puts this repo in a very small tier of truly well-engineered open source projects.

DocumentationREADME, setup, examples, license
97
EngineeringTests, CI, linting, lockfiles
96
Project healthDescription, activity, stars, deps
94

What to fix first

The highest-impact improvements for this repo.

  1. 1
    CI/CD
    EngineeringIssue

    Add a lint step to catch style issues automatically.

  2. 2
    CI/CD
    EngineeringInfo

    Add `tsc --noEmit`, `mypy`, or `cargo check` to catch type errors before they merge.

  3. 3
    CI/CD
    EngineeringInfo

    Upload coverage to Codecov, Coveralls, or report it with `--coverage` flags.

Detailed breakdown

Documentation

97
  • README100
    • README is present.
    • README is well structured with multiple sections.
    • README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    • README has code examples.
    • README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    • README includes status badges.
  • Install and run instructions90
    • README documents how to install the project.
    • README documents how to run the project.
    • No .env.example found (−10 pts).Add a .env.example listing all required environment variables so contributors know what to set up.
  • License100
    • Licensed under BSD-3-Clause.
  • Contributing guide100
    • Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    • Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.
    • Contributing guide describes code style expectations.
    • Contributing guide explains how to run tests.
    • Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    • Contributing guide includes code examples.
    • Optional: add a Code of Conduct.A CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md signals that your project is welcoming. GitHub has a template you can add in one click.

Engineering

96
  • Tests100
    • Test files detected (packages/application/jest.config.js).
  • CI/CD85

    Not applicable?

    • CI is configured (.github/workflows/build.yml).
    • CI workflow runs tests.
    • CI runs on pull requests, not just on pushes to main.
    • CI does not run a lint or format check (−15 pts).Add a lint step to catch style issues automatically.
    • Optional: add type checking to CI.Add `tsc --noEmit`, `mypy`, or `cargo check` to catch type errors before they merge.
    • Optional: report test coverage in CI.Upload coverage to Codecov, Coveralls, or report it with `--coverage` flags.
    • CI tests across multiple environments or versions.
  • Linting and formatting100
    • Linter or formatter configured (.prettierrc).
  • Reproducibility100
    • Lockfile present (yarn.lock). Installs are reproducible.
    • Environment pinned via .devcontainer/Dockerfile.
    • Dependabot covers 2 ecosystems (github-actions, pip). Dependencies stay current.
  • Issue and PR templates100
    • Issue or PR templates present.
    • Optional: add a SECURITY.md.A SECURITY.md explains how to responsibly disclose vulnerabilities. Worth adding once the project has real users.

Project health

94
  • Dependency manifest82
    • Dependency manifest found (package.json).
    • package.json is missing a description (−10 pts).Add a one-line description to package.json. It appears in npm search and on GitHub.
    • package.json links back to the repository.
    • package.json has no keywords (−8 pts).Add a `keywords` array to help people find your package on npm.
  • Repository metadata100
    • Repository has a description.
    • Primary language detected: Jupyter Notebook.
  • Activity100
    • Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
    • 13,204 stars.
  • Housekeeping100
    • .gitignore present.
Repository files37 root entries
  • .devcontainer
    Good: Environment pinned via .devcontainer/Dockerfile.
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/build.yml).
    Good: Dependabot covers 2 ecosystems (github-actions, pip). Dependencies stay current.
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • app
  • binder
  • buildutils
  • docs
  • jupyter-config
  • notebook
  • packages
    Good: Test files detected (packages/application/jest.config.js).
  • tests
  • ui-tests
  • .git-blame-ignore-revs
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml
  • .prettierignore
  • .prettierrc
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (.prettierrc).
  • .readthedocs.yaml
  • .yarnrc.yml
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Good: Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.
    Good: Contributing guide describes code style expectations.
    Good: Contributing guide explains how to run tests.
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • eslint.config.mjs
  • jupyter_config.json
  • jupyter-notebook.desktop
  • jupyter.svg
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under BSD-3-Clause.
  • notebook.svg
  • package.json
    Good: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
  • pixi.lock
  • pyproject.toml
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • RELEASE.md
  • setup.py
  • tsconfig.eslint.json
  • tsconfigbase.json
  • tsconfigbase.test.json
  • yarn.lock
    Good: Lockfile present (yarn.lock). Installs are reproducible.